Determinants of Premarital Sex Behavior: Application of Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory

Nur Laili Qomariah, Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari, Uki Retno Budihastuti

Abstract

Background: Health problems in adolescents are among the most important problems in the human life cycle, especially reproductive and sexual problems. Actively conducted premarital sex behavior poses a risk to teenage pregnancy and transmission of sexually transmitted dise­ases. This study aims to analyze the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory on the determinants of premarital sex behavior in adolescents.

Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sectional study design. The study was con­ducted at 25 high schools/vocational high schools in Gresik, East Java, from September to October 2020. A sampling of 200 adolescents used stratified random sampling and simple ran­dom sampling. The dependent variable was premarital sex behavior. The independent varia­­bles were the intention, attitude, subjec­tive norms, peer support, family intimacy, and self-efficacy. The data were collected by using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using multi­ple logistic regression with Stata 13.

Results: Premarital sexual behavior increased with strong intention (b= 1.06; 95% CI= 0.15 to 1.98; p= 0.015), positive attitude (b= 1.22; 95% CI= 0.38 to 2.13; p= 0.009), subjective norms supportive (b= 1.09; 95% CI= 0.14 to 2.04; p= 0.024), and strong peer support (b= 1.37; 95% CI= 0.44 to 2.30; p= 0.004). Premarital sexual behavior decreased with strong family intimacy (b= -1.32; 95% CI= -2.23 to -0.40; p= 0.005) and strong self-efficacy for abstinence (b=                 -1.03; 95% CI= -2.23 to -1.93; p= 0.025). There was an effect at the school level on premarital sex behavior with ICC 24.6%.

Conclusion: Premarital sexual behavior in­crea­ses with strong intentions, positive attitu­des, supportive subjective norms, and strong peer support. Premarital sexual behavior de­crea­ses with strong family intimacy and strong abstinence self-efficacy. There is an effect at the school level on premarital sexual behavior.

Keywords: premarital sex behavior, theory of planned behavior, social cognitive theory, ado­les­cents.

Correspondence: Nur Laili Qomariah. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Su­tami 36A, Surakarta 57126. Email: lailiqomar­@gmail.com. Mobile: +6281­234190160.

Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(04): 272-283
https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.04.05.

 

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajayi AI and Olamijuwon EO (2019). What predicts self-efficacy? Understanding the role of sociodemographic, behavioural and parental factors on condom use self-efficacy among university students in Nigeria. a. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0221804 https://doi.org/101371/journal.pone.02218-04.


Ajzen I (2011). The theory of planned beha-viour: reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887-0446.2011.613995.


Alhassan N dan Dodoo FNA (2020). Predic-tors of primary and secondary sex-ual abstinence among never-married youth in urban poor Accra, Ghana. Reprod. Health 17(28) htt-ps://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0885-4.


Boone MR, Cherenack EM, Wilson PA (2015). Self-Efficacy for Sexual Risk Reduction and Partner HIV Status as Correlates of Sexual Risk Beha-vior Among HIV-Positive Adolescent Girls and Women. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 29(6): 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2014.0175.


Ghaffari M, Gharghani ZG, Mehrabi Y, Ramezankhani A, Movahed M. (2016). Premarital sexual inter-course-related individual factors among Iranian adolescents: A quali-tative study. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 18(2): 21220. https://doi.org/10.-5812/ircmj.21220.


Gibbs SE, Le LC, Dao HB, Blum RW (2014). Peer and community influences on the acceptance of premarital sex among Vietnamese adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health, 50(6): 438–443.https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12512.


Kementerian Kesehatan RI (2018). Laporan hasil riset kesehatan dasar (riskes-das) Indonesia tahun 2018. riset kesehatan dasar 2018: 182–183. Retrieved from https://www.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/info-terkini/hasil-riskesdas-2018.pdf


Margaretha (2012). Psikologi forensik dan psikopatologi dan perilaku berisiko remaja. Retrieved from https://psi-kologiforensik.com/2012/03/02/pe-rilakuberesiko-remaja-seks-adiksi-dan-hiv/.


Morales A, Vallejo-Medina P, Abello-Luque D, Saavedra-Roa A, García-Roncallo P, Gomez-Lugo M, García-Montaño E, et. al., (2018). Sexual risk among Colombian adolescents: Knowledge, attitudes, normative beliefs, percei-ved control, intention, and sexual behavior. BMC Public Health, 18(1): 1377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1288-9-018-6311-y.


Motamedi M, Merghati-Khoei E, Shahbazi M, Rahimi-Naghani S, Salehi M, Karimi M, Hajebi A, et. al., (2016). Paradoxical attitudes toward prema-rital dating and sexual encounters in Tehran, Iran: A cross-sectional stu-dy. Reprod. Health, 13(1). https://-doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0210-4.


Munea AM, Alene GD, Debelew GT (2020). Does youth-friendly service inter-vention reduce risky sexual behavior in unmarried adolescents? A comparative study in west Gojjam zone, northwest Ethiopia. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, 13(1): 941–954. htt-ps://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S25-46885.


Rosenbaum JE, Weathersbee B (2013). True Love Waits: Do Southern Bap-tists? Premarital Sexual Behavior Among Newly Married Southern Baptist Sunday School Students. J Relig Health, 52(1): 263–275. https:-//doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9445-5.


Sani, AS, Abraham C, Denford S, Ball S (2016). School-based sexual health education interventions to prevent STI/HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-ana-lysis. BMC Public Health, 16(1): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3715-4.


Scull TM, Malik CV, Kupersmidt JB (2018). Understanding the unique role of media message processing in predicting adolescent sexual behavior intentions in the USA. J Child Media 12(3): 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.14-03937.


Shek DTL (2013). Sexual behavior and intention to engage in sexual behavior in junior secondary school students in Hong Kong. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 26(3 SUPPL): S33–S41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag-.2013.03.013.


Shek DTL dan Leung H (2016). Do Adolescent Sexual Behavior and Intention to Engage in Sexual Behavior Change in High School Years in HongKong?. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 29(1): S49-S60 https://doi-.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.008.


Thin Zaw PP, Liabsuetrakul T, McNeil E, Htay TT (2013). Gender differences in exposure to SRH information and risky sexual debut among poor Myanmar youths. BMC Public Health, 13(1): 1122. https://doi.org-/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1122.


Van de Bongardt D, Reitz E, Sandfort T, Deković M (2015). A Meta-Analysis of the Relations between Three Ty-pes of Peer Norms and Adolescent Sexual Behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 19(3): 203–234. https://doi.-org/10.1177/1088868314544223.


Yip PS, Zhang H, Lam TH, Lam KF, Lee AM, Chan J, Fan S (2013). Sex knowledge, attitudes, and high-risk sexual behaviors among unmarried youth in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health, 13(1): 691. https://doi.org/-10.1186/1471-2458-13-69.


WHO (2018). Adolescents: health risks and solutions Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-solutions.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.