Effect of PRECEDE–PROCEED Model on the Decision-Making of Implant Contraceptive Method among Women of Reproductive Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2026.11.02.11Abstract
Background: Implant contraception is a highly effective long-acting contraceptive method, but its use among women of reproductive age remains suboptimal. Decisions to use implant contraception are influenced by demographic characteristics, predisposing factors, enabling factors, and reinforcing factors. This study aimed to analyze the direct and indirect effects of PRECEDE–PROCEED Model indicators on decision-making regarding implant contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in the working area of Miri Public Health Center, Sragen Regency.
Subjects and Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 422 women of reproductive age in the working area of Miri Public Health Center, Sragen Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Respondents were selected using fixed control sampling. The dependent variable was implant contraceptive use. Independent variables included education, age, occupation, income, knowledge, attitude, enabling factors, family support, social support, and community support. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using the Chi-square test and path analysis with Generalized Structural Equation Modeling.
Results: Implant contraceptive use was directly increased by age (b=2.56; 95% CI=1.82 to 3.31; p<0.001), family support (b=0.94; 95% CI=0.22 to 1.65; p=0.010), social support (b=2.75; 95% CI= 1.78 to 3.72; p<0.001), and positive attitude (b=2.57; 95% CI=1.82 to 3.33; p<0.001). Conversely, education (b=-1.09; 95% CI=-1.80 to -0.38; p=0.003) and occupation (b=-1.00; 95% CI= -1.73 to -0.28; p=0.006) reduced implant contraceptive use. Income and enabling factors showed no significant direct effects. Attitude was positively influenced by age (b= 1.17; p<0.001), knowledge (b= 0.82; p= 0.037), and family support (b= 1.38; p<0.001), while social and community support had no significant effects.
Conclusion: Implant contraceptive use was influenced by age, education, occupation, family support, social support, and attitude. Attitude acted as an important mediator linking age, knowledge, and family support to implant contraceptive use.
Keywords:
PRECEDE–PROCEED model, implant contraception, family planning, social support
How to Cite
References
Baihaqi A. (2025). Implementasi program keluarga berencana (KB) implan di Kecamatan Amuntai Selatan Kabu-paten Hulu Sungai Utara (studi kasus Desa Jarang Kuantan dan Desa Ilir Mesjid). [in Indonesian language]. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik. 2(3): 1221–1232.
Beyene KM, Bekele SA, Abu MK (2023). Factors affecting utilization of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 18(11): 1–12. https://doi.org/-10.1371/journal.pone.0294444.
D’Souza P, Bailey JV, Stephenson J Oliver S. (2022). Factors influencing contra-ception choice and use globally: A synthesis of systematic reviews. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 27(5): 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1-080/13625187.2022.2096215.
Fekadu GA, Omigbodun AO, Roberts OA, et al. (2019). Factors associated with long acting and permanent contracep-tive methods use in Ethiopia. Contra-ception and Reproductive Medicine, 4(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40834-019-0091-3.
Gobena MG, Kassie MZ (2024). Determi-nants of the use of modern contracep-tives among women of reproductive age group in Ethiopia: A multilevel mixed effects analysis. PLoS ONE, 19(7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/-journal.pone.0306635.
Khademi K, Kaveh MH. (2025). A pioneer-ing health education strategy based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model for women’s health challenges: A systematic review and logic framework. BMC Women’s Health. 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0.
Jonas K, Mazinu M, Kalichman M, Kalichman S, Lombard C, Morroni C, Mathews C (2021). Factors associated with the use of the contraceptive implant among women attending a primary health clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. Front Glob Women’s Health. 2: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3-389/fgwh.2021.672365.
Mahmoud H, Hassan HM, Morsy A (2020). Effect of educational intervention based on PRECEDE-PROCEED model on osteoporosis preventive behaviors among perimenopausal women. Egypt J Health Care. 11(4): 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.21608-/ejhc.2020.239356.
Mekonnen BD, Wubneh CA (2022). Utiliza-tion of implant contraceptive methods and associated factors among repro-ductive-age women in Ethiopia. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772-/intechopen.103868.
Muzyati, Marliani, Ananda IV, Sinaga SN, Karin SF, Lumbantoruan SO, Larasa R (2026. Optimalisasi pelayanan kebidanan komunitas faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pemilihan alat kontrasepsi implant pada pasangan usia subur di Kelurahan Dolok Sinumbah Kabupaten Simalungun Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2024. [in Indonesian]. Forum Ilmiah Diskusi Mahasiswa. (Forisma) VII(7): 314–319. https://prosidingmhm.mi-trahusada.ac.id/index.php/forisma/article/view/1390/679
National Population and Family Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Badan Kependu-dukan Dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Republik Indo-nesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang pemenuhan kebutuhan alat dan obat kontrasepsi bagi pasangan usia subur dalam pela-yanan keluarga berencana (Regula-tion of the National Population and Family Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 concerning the fulfillment of contraceptive device and contracep-tive medicine needs for couples of reproductive age in family planning services. [In Indonesian]. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/-Details/254345/peraturan-bkkbn-no-1-tahun-2023.
Rahmawati R, Rahardjo SS, Murti B (2024). Meta-analysis: Effect of tuberculosis infection control training on work performance among health staff in health facilities. J Health Policy Manage. 09(03): 324–334. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpm.2024.09.03.03.
Senderowicz L, Kolenda A (2022). ‘“She told me no, that you cannot change”: Understanding provider refusal to remove contraceptive implants. SSM Qual Res Health. 2: 100154. https://-doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100154
Oktaviani T, Sari RG, Aisyah S (2025). Determinants of contraceptive implant use: A cross-sectional study at Pematang Panggang IV Community Health Center in 2025. Jurnal Lantera Ilmiah Kesehatan, 3(88): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.52120/jlik.v3i2.133.
Tang S, Anderson NE, Faasse K, Adams WP, Newby JM. (2022). A qualitative study on the experiences of women with breast implant illness. Aesthet Surg J. 42(4): 381–393. https://doi.-org/10.1093/asj/sjab204
Zendehdel M, Jahanfar S, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Fooladi E. (2020). An investigation into long-acting reversible contracep-tion: Use, awareness, and associated factors. Eur J Environ Public Health, 4(2): https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph-/7837.
