Meta Analysis of Health Belief Model Theory on the Predictor of HPV Vaccine Uptake in Women of Reproductive Age

Authors

  • Nurul Qomariah Master's Program of Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Bhisma Murti Master's Program of Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Uki Retno Budihastuti Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Central Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2024.09.01.05

Abstract

Background: Lack of knowledge about the use of HPV vaccine in women of productive age can result in cervical cancer. This study aims to determine the effect of the Health Belief Model application on the predictor of HPV vaccine uptake in women of reproductive age.

Subjects and Method: Systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted using PRISMA guidelines and PICO model including: Population = women of reproductive age; Intervention= high perceived benefits, high perceived severity, high perceived susceptibility; Comparison= low perceived benefits, low perceived severity, low perceived susceptibility; Outcome= HPV vaccine uptake. Articles were collected from databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The keywords used in the database search were "Health Belief Model" AND "Human Papilloma Virus" OR "HPV" AND "Women" AND "cross sectional study". A total of 7 articles met the inclusion criteria, namely full-text primary paper, cross-sectional study design, with a measure of association was the Odds Ratio (OR), the study subjects were women of reproductive age, interventions were in the form of high perceived benefits, high perceived severity, high perceived vulnerability, and the outcome was in the form of HPV vaccine use. They were subsequently assessed for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3.

Results: Meta-analysis from Indonesia, Ethiopia, the United Kingdom, Japan, Romania, Spain, and Italy showed that high perceived benefits of HPV vaccine use (aOR= 1.81; 95% CI= 1.00 to 3.26; p= 0.050), high perceived severity (aOR= 1.78; 95% CI= 0.94 to 3.40; p= 0.080), and high perceived susceptibility (aOR= 1.70; CI 95%= 0.75 to 3.83; p= 0. 200) increased the likelihood of HPV vaccine uptake.

Conclusion: High perceived benefits, high perceived severity, and high perceived susceptibility have the likelihood of women of productive age to use HPV vaccine

Keywords:

health belief model, human papilloma virus, perceived severity, perceived benefits,, perceived susceptibility

References

Carico RR, Sheppard J, Thomas CB (2021). Community pharmacists and communication in the time of COVID-19: Applying the health belief model. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 17(1): 1984–1987. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.-2020.03.017

Donadiki EM, Jiménez-García R, Hernán-dez-Barrera V, Sourtzi P, Carrasco-Garrido P, López de Andrés A, et al. (2014). Health Belief Model applied to non-compliance with HPV vaccine among female university students. Public Health, 128(3): 268–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.12.004

Fallucca A, Immordino P, Riggio L, Casu¬ccio A, Vitale F, Restivo V (2022). Acceptability of HPV Vaccination in Young Students by Exploring Health Belief Model and Health Literacy. Vaccines, 10(7). DOI: 10.3390/vacci-nes10070998

Fitriani GA, Rahardjo SS, Murti B. (2018). Biopsychosocial Determinants of Human Papilloma Virus Immuniza¬tion in Women of Reproductive Age in Surakarta, Central Java. J. Health. Promot. Behav. 03(01), 66–77. DOI: 10.26911/thejhpb.2018.¬03.01.07

Feyisa G, Temesgen H (2019). Perceived benefits and barriers toward cervical cancer screening among women ≥15 years in Arsi Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia: Application of the health belief model in a community-based cross-sectional study. J. Cancer Res. Pract., 6(1): 7. DOI: 10.4103/jcrp.jcrp118

Khairunnisa P, Ronoatmodjo S, & Prasetyo S (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Mem-pengaruhi Perempuan Melakukan Pemeriksaan Dini Kanker Serviks : A Scoping Review. J Epidemiologi Kesehatan Indonesia. 6(2): 75–80. DOI: 10.7454/epidkes.v6i2.6256

Kulkarni SP, Paliwal S, Kosta S (2023). Genotypic Diversity of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Types and Its Pre-valence With Cervical Cancer (CC) in Central India. 15: DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35227

Maryam M, Ariono HW (2022). Sistem Pakar Pengklasifikasi Stadium Kanker Serviks Berbasis Mobile Menggunakan Metode Decision Tree. Jurnal Kajian. Ilmiah. 22(3), 267–278. DOI: 10.-31599/jki.v22i3.1368

Marlow LAV, Waller J, Evans REC, Wardle J (2009). Predictors of interest in HPV vaccination: A study of British adolescents. Vaccine, 27(18), 2483–2488. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacc-ine.2009.-02.057

Murti B (2018). prinsip dan metode riset epidemiologi (5th ed). Program studi ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, Program pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Novalia V (2023). Kanker Serviks. GALENICAL: J. Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan. 2(1), 45. DOI: 10.29103/jkkmm.¬v2i1.-10134

Penţa MA, Crăciun IC, Băban A (2020). The power of anticipated regret: Predictors of HPV vaccination and seasonal influenza vaccination acceptability among young Romanians. Vaccine, 38(6), 1572–1578. DOI: 10.101-6/j.vaccine.2019.11.04.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Qomariah, N., Murti, B., & Budihastuti, U. R. (2024). Meta Analysis of Health Belief Model Theory on the Predictor of HPV Vaccine Uptake in Women of Reproductive Age . Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior, 9(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2024.09.01.05

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>