The Influence of Personal Factor, Husband’s support, Health Workers and Peers toward the Use of IVA Screening among Women of Reproductive Age in the Regency of Karanganyar
Abstract
Background: Cervix cancer has been one of the highest cancer cases and becomes one of the main problems in women’s health throughout the world. The percentage of Women of Reproductive Age who performs early cancer detection is an indicator of success for health development. The Regency of Karanganyar is one of the regencies in the Province of Central Java with the percentage of Women of Reproductive Age who perform Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (IVA) is equal to 5.50%. This percentage is still far below the target that has been set which is 10.00%.
Subjects and Methods: This was an analytic observational study with cross-sectional design. This study was carried out in Regency of Karanganyar. The subjects who had been involved were 150 respondents and these subjects were selected by means of fixed disease sampling. This sampling resulted in 50 cases and 100 controls. The dependent variable was behavior of using IVA screening, while the independent variables were perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness, perceived benefits, perceived obstacles, husband’s support, health workers support, peer support, perceived threats and self-efficacy. In processing the data, the researchers implemented path analysis by means of Stata 13.
Results: The results of the study showed perceived threats (b= 0.08; 95% CI= <0.01 until 0.16; p= 0.043), perceived benefits (b= 0.05; 95% CI= <-0.01 until 0.117; p= 0.091), perceived obstacles (b= -0.49; 95% CI= -0.07 until 0.11; p= 0.091), self-efficacy (b= 0.04; 95% CI= -0.13 until 0.11; p= 0.125), perceived susceptibility (b= 0.23; 95% CI= 0.11-0.34; p <0.001), perceived seriousness (b= 0.11; CI9 95%= 0.00 until 0.22; p= 0.049), husband’s support (b= 0.14; 95% CI= -0.01 until 0.29; p=0.068), health workers support (b= -0.23; 95% CI=-0.54 until 0.08; p= 0.149) and peer support (b= 0.18; 95% CI= -0.13 until 0.51; p= 0.256).
Conclusion: There is a direct influence from perceived benefits, perceived obstacles, perceived threats and self-efficacy toward behavior of using IVA screening. Then, there is indirect influence from perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness, husband’s support, health workers support and peer support toward behavior of using IVA screening.
Keywords: IVA, HBM, support, path analysis
Correspondence: Martini Shoim Wakhidah. Masters Program of Public Health, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. Email:afkarshoim_msw@yahoo.com. Mobile: +6285235464812.
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2017), 2(2): 124-137
https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2017.02.02.03
References
Bandura A (1994). Self-efficacy in Ramachaudran (Ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior. 4: 71-81. New York: Academic Press.
Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah (2015). Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2015. Semarang: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah.
Ibekwe CM, Hoque ME, Ntuli-Ngcobo B (2010). Perceived Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Attending Mahalapye District Hospital, Botswana. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: 11
Ibekwe CM, Hoque ME, Ntuli-Ngcobo B (2011). Perceived Barriers of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Attending Mahalapye Distict Hospital, Botswana. iMedPub Journals. 2 (1)
Kemenkes (2015). Pusat Data dan Informasi. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.
Kemenkes (2015). Buletin Jendela Data dan Informasi. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.
Kemenkes (2015). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.
Kissal A, Birgul V, Fatma E, Tudba S (2016). The Effect of Women’s Breast Cancer Fear and Social Support Perception on the Process of Participating in Screening. IUHPE-Global Health Promotion: 1757-9759
Kurniawati W, Faridah A, sugeng M (2015). Fakto-faktor yang berhubungan dengan Perilaku WUS dalam melakukan deteksi dini kanker serviks dengan metode inspeksi visual asam asetat (IVA) di Wilayah kerja Puskesmas Kretek Bantul.
Lugue JS, Tarasenko YN, Reves-Garcia C, Alfonso ML, Suazo N, Rebing L, Ferris DG (2016). Salud es Vida: a Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention for Rural Latina Immigrant Women. J Cancer Education
Noorkasiani (2009). Sosiologi Keperawatan. Jakarta : Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC.
Oktaviana MR. (2015). Hubungan antara persepsi kerentanan individu, keseriusan penyakit, manfaat dan hambatan dengan penggunaan skrining Inspeksi Visual Asam Asetat pada Wanita Usia Subur. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret
Penney TL, McIsaac JL, Storey K, Kontak J, Ata N, Kuhle S, Kirk SFL (2016). Examining the Context of Health Promoting Schools: a Trasnlational Approach to Characterization and Measurement of School Ethos to Support Health and Wellbeing. BMC Public Health
Rosser JI, Betty N, Megan J, Hucko (2015). Knowledge about Cervical Cancer Screening and Perception of risk among women attending outpatient clinics in rural kenya. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 128 (3): 211-215.
Sarafino EP (1998). Health psycology biopsycososial Interactions. Third edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Inc
Taylor SE (2011). Social Support: In: Friedman HS, Editor. Oxford book of Health Psychology. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
Welchen T, Minggen L, Daniel C (2010). Cervical Cancer Screening Among Taiwanese Women: A Transtheoretical Approach. Oncology Nursing Forum. 37 (4).
Were E, Nyaberi Z , Buziba N (2011). Perceptions of risk and barriers to cervical cancer screening at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya. NCBI Journal.
Widihastuti A, et al (2013). Modul Pelatihan Layanan Kesehatan Seksual & Reproduksi Ramah Remaja untuk Dokter Praktik Swasta di Dearah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Kemitraan UNFPA dan Angsamerah Institution.
Wigati PA (2016). Analisis Jalur dengan health belief model tentang penggunaan skrining inspeksi visual asam asetat untuk deteksi dini kanker serviks pada wanita usia subur. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret
